Is This the Future of Preaching?

Posted by iCanuck | Posted in church | Posted on 18-07-2009

5,858

video teaching

Click on image to go to Video Teaching

I learned about this new website from www.churchcrunch.com.

It looks like it is offering free video sermons from some of the best preachers in North America to any church anywhere.

Cool!  . . . and at the same time . . .

“Wait. What does this mean for the future of preaching?”

Any one can already listen to the most popular preachers on the radio, TV, the Internet etc.  But, now churches will be able to fill their pulpits with these sermons.   Many churches are already doing similar things when they open satellite campuses where all the different locations are watching and listening to the same preacher via video or satellite.  So, this is really not all THAT new.

Yet, it DOES accentuate a problem in the local church setting.  Chances are that you church does not have one of the best preachers in America.  Most preachers are not amazing preachers.  Some are bad, some are good.  But few can compare to the popular ones.

Since we can hear the best sermons online or on radio, we probably are not going to church on Sunday to hear a good sermon, are we?  Are you?  We can stay home and hear amazing sermons, can’t we?

MY QUESTIONS . . .

Let me ask:

1) Why DO you go to church (if you do)?

2) And, would you mind (or prefer) if your church used video sermons from some of the best preachers in the country?

Definitions of Consumer Christianity

Posted by iCanuck | Posted in Bible, church | Posted on 16-07-2009

5,774

skye

Skye Jethani’s new book Divine Commodity explores how consumerism has impacted our understanding of church, worship, mission, community, and God. He also offers insights into how we can overcome the influence of “Consumer Christianity” and awaken our imaginations through practicing private and corporate spiritual disciplines.

In keeping with that theme, Out of Ur is sponsoring a contest to see whether Urbanites can spot Consumer Christianity when they see it.

You can read a sample of the book here!!

See the sidebar for a short interview with Skye about consumerism and the North American church.  (The sidebar is over there. :) ) → → → →

So, here is my definition for the contest.  I have already purchased the book and am waiting for it to be delivered from Amazon.  So, if I win I can pass the book on to someone else – maybe one of you!!

[stextbox id="info" caption="My Definition"]“The propagation of the idea that spiritual wellness can be purchased with goods, seminars, conferences, or even Bibles.  Consider the following two statistics: (1)The average household in America owns four Bibles; and, (2) Bible publishers sell 25 million Bibles per year to people who already have one!”[/stextbox]

In “Something Beautiful”, Sinead O’ Connor sings:

Oh I wanna make something
So lovely for you
‘Cus I promised that’s what I’d do for you
With the bible I stole
I know you forgave my soul
Because such was my need on a chronic Christmas Eve
And I think we’re agreed that it should have been free
And you sang to me

So, what do you think?  I know that many of you will have better definitions of consumer Christianity that I, so why don’t you enter the contest as well?  And, if you feel free, let us know what your definition is!

Dilemmas in the Institutionalization of Religion

Posted by iCanuck | Posted in church, religion | Posted on 09-07-2009

5,971

christ_religion

Thomas O’Dea wrote, “Five Dilemmas in the Institutionalization of Religion” in 1961.  Here is a link to the original article. I first learned about this article through the insightful and briliant book, Rejesus: A Wild Messiah For A Missional Church by Alan Hirsch and Michael Frost.

This is what Hirsch and Frost say on page 69 of the book:

“What happens in the beginning of a movement is that the people encounter the divine in a profound and revelatory way, but with successive generations this encounter tends to fade like a photocopy of a photocopy of a photocopy.  What begins as a revolutionary, life-transforming, confrontation with Jesus eventually subsides into a codified religion and is subsequently incorporated into normal social life.”

They describe the irresolvable dilemma in this way:

“Although genuine faith is born out of direct encounters with God, it cannot survive and prosper without some form of stability and order. Viewed positively, rituals, creeds, and organizations can help people structure their relationship with God.  In fact, we believe this is what they were initially designed for.  But unless the worshipper is very wary, the glory of the God encounter will slowly fade and the ritual, creeds, and rules intended to preserve the encounter will take its place.”

Thomas O’Dea, in the article linked to above, points out how consecutive generations tend to construct religious systems to take the place of the original encounter.  Thus, the “crisis inevitably dawns when the outward forms of worship no longer match the inward experience and spiritual condition of the participants.  Decline becomes inevitable.  Authentic Christianity is subverted and constant renewals become necessary.”  (Hirsch and Frost, 77).

So what are these five dilemmas the Thomas O’Dea wrote about?  I have summarized them below.  If you look at the original article, you will see why a summary is helpful! :)

1. THE DILEMMA OF MIXED MOTIVATION

In the beginning, in what O’Dea calls the “pre-institutionalized stage” of a religious movement, the disciples are gathered around a charismatic leader and there is only one single motivation.  When the movement is stabilized with an institutional matrix, new kinds of motivation arise – needs for prestige, leadership, power, and respect. An example from the New Testament is seen where we read the disciples becoming concerned with who shall be the highest in the kingdom.

Institutions can mobilize all these different kinds of motivation but selection and promotion within the organization must reflect the functional needs of the organization and therefore will not distinguish between the different motivations.  The self-interested motivation may prevail leading to its corruption.  Mixed motivation is not unique to leadership but changes the composition of its members.  With the passing of the founding generation, the religious body now contains people who have not had the original conversion experience.  “The selection process which voluntary conversion represented often kept out of the organization precisely the kinds of persons who are now brought up within it.”

2. THE SYMBOLIC DILEMMA: OBJECTIFICATION VERSUS ALIENATION

Our response to the holy is expressed not only in community, but also in worship.  However, in order to survive its charismatic moment, worship must become stabilized in established forms.  Thus, ritual develops forcing to conform our interior disposition to this symbolic order.  So, worship becomes an objective reality that imposes its own patterns upon the participants.

And yet, this “objectification” is necessary for common worship for without it prayer would be individual, not communal.  The ritualization which makes it possible to worship in community can become so routinized that it becomes cut off from the experience of the participants.  Thus, we have alienation.   (I wonder if this is what I see in contemporary church services when participants are text messaging or talking on their cell phones while the worship band plays on.)

“To symbolize the transcendent is to take the inevitable risk of losing the contact with it.  To embody the sacred in a vehicle is to run the risk of its secularization.  Yet if religious life is to be shared and transmitted down the generations the attempt must be made.”  The medium of genuine communication becomes a barrier and an object of aggression. (Could this be the basis for the “worship wars”, the denomination rifts, or the strong feelings invoked by some by the words, Emergent, Charismatic, Evangelical, or Institutional Church?)

3. THE DILEMMA OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

Charismatic leadership quickly changes into a traditional structure consisting of a chief and an administrative staff.  Precedents are established, new offices and roles are formed, new communication protocols and soon the structure is in danger of complicating itself.  “The tendency or organization to complicate itself to meet new situations often transforms it into an awkward and confusing mechanism within whose context is it difficult to accomplish anything.”

4. THE DILEMMA OF DELIMITATION: CONCRETE DEFINITION VERSUS SUBSTITUTION OF LETTER FOR SPIRIT

In order to have an impact on our lives, religious insights must be translated into terms relevant for everyday life.  These terms, however elaborate, or however gifted the communicator maybe be, can’t make explicit all that is implied in the original insight or experience.  A similar thing happens when you try to explain a dream or a wonderful experience to someone.  Your words can never fully encapsulate your original experience.  And yet we must try or the experience will be lost by others.  The risk is that it may end up being reduced too much which would lead to a deadening legalism.

5. THE DILEMMA OF POWER: CONVERSION VERSUS COERCION

The propagation of Christianity involves an interior “change” or “conversion”.  This decision is the beginning of the religious life for the individual.  “With institutionalization of the religious movement, such a conversion may be replace by the socialization of the young so that a slow process of education and training substitutes for the more dramatic experience.”  Of course, this kind of socialization often paves the way for conversion.   Since religion depends on this interior disposition of the individuals who are vulnerable to outside influences, there is a temptation to use the close relation or similarities between religion and societal values to reinforce the religion.  The organization, in its search for power, is often co-opted by the very forces it seeks to control.

Those are the five dilemmas written about in the article, “Five Dilemmas in the Institutionalization of Religion”.  The article takes a long time to wade through so I hope it benefits you to have my brief synopsis here.  I searched for a summary but couldn’t find one so hopefully this one will suffice for now.  If, after reading the article, you have something to add or can word it better than I, let me know and I would be glad to include it here!

Again, comments are always welcome and not moderated.



Excited About “The Tangible Kingdom”

Posted by iCanuck | Posted in books, church, house church | Posted on 17-06-2009

5,603

tangible-kingdom

A friend has lent me this book and I am enjoying it so far.   The Tangible Kingdom: Creating Incarnational Community

I like that the authors are not negative toward certain forms of church; I like that the model they are promoting is something that can be used in house churches, small groups, or even mega-churches; I like that they give me practical steps on how to accomplish the kind of community I long for; and, I like that they make me feel hopeful!

It’s not about attracting Christian people to a worship service.  The goal is to be the faithful church in small pockets throughout the city – places of inclusive belonging where God’s alternative Kingdom can be experienced.

Look inside the book here to get a feel for what I am talking about.

The following is from the website, http://www.tangiblekingdom.com:

Jesus’ news about His Kingdom is a wild, life-reorienting message. It changes people, cities, and the social fabric. It looks quite different from the religion common to some of our present-day church experiences.

Watch as a normal God-searching man finds hope as he sees a glimpse of the Kingdom in a community of friends, around a table, and everywhere he goes.

The Tangible Kingdom helps open a window into the uneasiness many of us feel when what we’ve read in Scripture does not line up with our experiences of church or religion.


Migrating to New Church Paradigms

Posted by iCanuck | Posted in church, house church | Posted on 14-06-2009

5,712

migration

Photo: Brian Guest

As we all know, many people are not satisfied with their own church experiences and the number only seems to be growing.  Those of us with the palms of our hands on the railroad track feel the vibrations of new paradigms of church approaching. (just had a flashback to the movie Stand By Me :) )

Wolfgang Simson talks about the steps of migrating from the old paradigm to the new one.  In his talk, he assumes that the new paradigm to which people are moving is the house church paradigm.  While I do resonate with much of the house church movement, I hesitate to assume that it will be the only new paradigm of church that will flourish in the following generations.  (NOTE: I misunderstood Wolfgang here.  Please note his response below in the comment section.) However, I do agree that we are in desperate need of new paradigms for church expressions.  Here is the diagram the Wolfgang uses to portray the steps people take in adopting a new church paradigm.

5-steps3

(Click on the image to go to the original article.)

Point – 2: This is where most Christians are today as this new move of God unfolds. This is the point of “happy clappy” churchianity where most people are content with where they are in their church experience. When you talk to them about the need for a new paradigm their response is basically, “I have no idea what you are talking about.”
Point – 1: This second point or step in apostolic migration represents people who are no longer satisfied with “happy clappy church” as they have known it. These are people who have heard from God about more authentic expressions of church. They have begun to move in their spirits, but their bodies and their money have not yet moved. They are frustrated pilgrims. Some will move to the next step, while others will not.
Point 0: This third step represents frustrated pilgrims who have finally left the old paradigm and are now “out of the system,” but they do not yet know that there is a new paradigm to move into. And there is a reason for this. God knows that it is easier to get a person “out of the system” than it is to get the old system out of the person. For this reason God engineers the wilderness as a place of to the old, a place of “religious detoxification” where God deals with our “baggage.” It is in the wilderness that God seeks to heal our hurts, wounds, bitterness, anger and other personal “baggage” left over from our journey out of the old. Not everyone “survives” the wilderness experience to emerge healthy at the next Point. Some people are unable to “let go” of the past (past wounds, hurts, betrayals, etc.) in order to embrace God’s future plans.
Point + 1: This is the stage or point at which people choose to leave the past and the wilderness behind and to “cross over the ” into the new paradigm of what God is doing. This requires both a leaving (of the old) and a cleaving (to the new). It requires us to “uncovenant” with what has gone before, and to make a new covenant with God’s new unfolding paradigm. It is often at this point that a person’s commitment or lack of commitment to the new paradigm is revealed through statements like, “You mean I must do house church exclusively?” Such a response reveals that the person hasn’t yet caught the vision of God’s new paradigm and is still trying to “straddle” both worlds (the old versus the new). It means they aren’t quite ready to emerge from the wilderness because they haven’t yet fully died to themselves and to the old.
Point + 2: Welcome to the new paradigm that God is raising up in our day. At this point you have died to yourself and the past and have embraced the new thing God is doing. Your work isn’t over. In fact, it’s just beginning.

Where are you on the continuum of migration?  Which of these 5 points do you most resonate with?

From Eternity to Here – Book Review

Posted by iCanuck | Posted in books, church, house church | Posted on 09-06-2009

5,566

viola-eternity
Technorati Profile
A few years ago, I read several books by Frank Viola and I enjoyed all of them.  They provided me with a fresh perspective on church and gave me vocabulary to express my thoughts.  The books were part of a series and they looked pretty ugly (click here, here and here if you want to see what I mean.)  But we all know we shouldn’t judge a book by its cover, don’t we?  I enjoyed the books for two reasons: 1) they helped me; and, 2) they were great conversation starters.

Frank Viola’s new book, From Eternity to Here has a clean, sharp look (i.e. not as ugly as the earlier books :) ) but I don’t feel it provided the same fodder for discussion as some of his other books do.  Before I say anymore, I asked Frank these two questions about his newest book:

Questions for the Author

5 Reasons to Follow Jesus (that does not include hell)

Posted by iCanuck | Posted in church, religion | Posted on 08-06-2009

5,460

follow_jesus

Two recent posts addressed some questions about hell (How Not to Invite Someone to Church and Does Hell Exist) and so I thought it would be a good idea to give these 5 reasons to follow Jesus that does not include hell.  Here they are:

  1. . . . the life Jesus offers is like a treasure discovered in a field and when you find it you realize it is so valuable that you would give up anything to possess it. God is worth knowing just because of how incredibly awesome he is.  (Matthew 13:44)
  2. . . . God’s kingdom is near and you can be an active participant in His kingdom!
  3. . . . you have a Father who loves you like no other father you’ve ever known in your life and can now discover what it means to have a daily relationship with him. (Luke 15:11-32)
  4. . . . you will never know how loved you really are. (Ephesians 3:17-19)
  5. . . . Jesus’ death on the cross was an act of love for you. This love will allow you to feel perfectly safe in the Father’s presence. It frees you to be exactly who you are, weaknesses and all, and never again have to pretend before him.  (1 John 4:7-21)

I also recommend the following post:

7 Reasons You Should Not Become a Christian (And One Reason You Should) by John Bowen (Wycliffe College, University of Toronto)

And, you might find this one interesting as well: Top Ten Reasons to Follow Jesus

Can you add more “positive” reasons for following Jesus?

5 Challenges to the Priesthood of All Believers

Posted by iCanuck | Posted in church, religion | Posted on 30-05-2009

5,659

priesthood of all believers

One of the things I do not appreciate about every church I have ever been involved with is the hierarchical structure of authority.  It is very interesting to me that Dr. Barb Orlowski, in her soon-to-be-published dissertation on spiritual abuse in churches, devotes an entire chapter to the hierarchical structure of authority.  Wait a minute  . . .   so, that would mean . . . spiritual abuse might maybe “possibly” perhaps be connected to the hierarchical church structure?  Here is the link to her dissertation – pay special attention to chapter 3.

Here is an excerpt from her work:

The priesthood of all God’s people, first introduced by Luther, was lost as the church quickly returned to hierarchical structures of leadership.  The challenge we face in restoring the priesthood of all God’s people is:

  1. current leaders are accustomed to control;
  2. leaders fear disorder if they are not in control;
  3. a sense of “professional” leadership has crept into the church, which means pastors often rely on their natural talent, instead of the Spirit and insist on looking and sounding respectable;
  4. modern individualism has impacted our thinking causing us to lose the biblical perspective of the Spirit; and finally,
  5. we use the wrong dominant model in church.  Most of our churches have the larger body and smaller groups.  The mistake of most churches is to import the larger group into the smaller group rather than allowing the small groups to impact the larger group.  This wrongly directed model eventually kills the small group rather than promoting “every member ministry”.  Leaders must work to make a congregational life full of participation.

from Robert Webber, The Younger Evangelicals (p150-1) as written in the above linked dissertation

People Who Leave Church – A New Study

Posted by iCanuck | Posted in books, church, quitting church | Posted on 30-05-2009

5,871

exit

OK, so here is the post I talked about here.  Church EXITers!  Dr. Barb Orlowski has recenty finished research on people who leave church.  Her work was done in British Columbia, Canada and you can read all about it here.

It is no secret anymore that people are quitting church by the droves.   A simple cursory overview of recent headlines attest to this fact.  So, when I come across new research that helps us to look more deeply into the issue I am eager to see what conclusions are drawn as to how to address the issue.

While many people leave the church because they have felt there is something more to following Jesus than what they find in a local church setting, this particular study deals with people who have left church because of spiritual abuse.

Click here to read about this study!


Here is what Dr. Barb Orlowski says about this yet-to-be-published book:

Concept Statement


This book provides a ministry tool for the Christian community. It allows those who have recovered from the distressing church experience of spiritual abuse an opportunity to tell their stories and to be heard. It provides a behind the scenes look at how Christians can recover from this devastating experience and how those desiring to help can minister effectively. It is suitable for scholars or a general audience.

The Gap That This Book is Seeking to Fill

Why Christians leave institutional churches is an increasingly popular topic catching the attention of researchers who make it their goal to understand its causes and prevalence and to bring it to the attention of church leaders. Meager current literature has described the reasons why Christians leave churches or, more significantly, has provided viable prescriptions for recovery. This study traces a clear path which spiritual people have travelled from their dilemma to wholesomeness.

Barb would love your input as she continues to explore this very timely issue.  Please visit the Church Exiters homepage and find the link to her email address.

[stextbox id="warning" caption="Time is Running Out!"]After posting this, I received an update from Dr. Barb Orlowski.  The dissertation is going to the publishers soon and when it does you will not be able to access the full dissertation online.  So if you are interested, please go visit www.churchexiters.com before it is too late![/stextbox]

How (NOT) to Invite Someone to Church

Posted by iCanuck | Posted in church, religion | Posted on 28-05-2009

5,633

I decided to “accept Jesus as my personal Saviour” when I was a young child because I was afraid of hell.  I mean, seriously, what 6 year old would not be afraid of . . .

  • burning forever in a lake of fire,
  • not being able to see anyone else ever,
  • and having your eyeballs gauged out with a red-hot poker by Satan himself!

No sir, I did not need any more motivation than that.  I would be stupid NOT to say the sinner’s prayer.  So I did.  Many times.   I also learned that if my friends did not also accept Jesus into their heart, that their blood would be on my hands.  I never understood that one but it is what I was taught.

So without further adieu,  watch this video clip (I hope you find it as amusing as my wife and I did).

[flickrvideo]http://www.flickr.com/photos/7225566@N03/3564928729/[/flickrvideo]

I became a Christian because I was afraid of hell.  As I look back, I realize that it was not a very good way to start my relationship with God.